What is the difference between Xinix and other products, eg chlorine ?

Xinix products inactivate ALL viruses, fungi & bacteria as t.ex E-Coli, Legionella, Salmonella, SARS-Covid and Clostridium.

XINIX FreeBact® Water | Drinks & Tank
The big difference between our product and t.ex chlorine-based, is that with Xinix FreeBact Water you only get a barely traceable amount of regular salt as a residual product.

Doesn't taste like swimming pool & you don't ingest any chemicals (unlike t.ex chlorine tablets).

Chlorine-based disinfection of water and surfaces takes time. Bacteria can also build up a resistance to chlorine. It also requires a significantly larger amount of chlorine than the chlorine dioxide in Xinix products.

See comparison between Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide.


XINIX FreeBact® Surface

You need very little, about half the volume, to disinfect surfaces compared to alcohol-based products and it takes less than a minute.

Alcohol-based disinfection has no effect on naked viruses or spore-forming bacteria which are a major cause of healthcare-associated infections that cause 4 people to die every day in Sweden. Alcohol-based disinfectant products can also cause chapped and strained hands, which in turn can cause problems with putting on protective gloves, as well as general discomfort.

Xinix products are approximately 5 times as effective as chlorine-based disinfectants and 3 times as effective as alcohol-based ones.

See chart below for comparison with chlorine, alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, clover extract, ozone, quats and colloidal silver.
[Sources at the end of the page]

Text Column's with media

Xinix Freebact® Water and Xinix Freebact® Surface/Chlorine Dioxide

✅ Low toxicity [1, 2]

✅ Leaves no harmful chlorinated, organic by-products

✅ Aqueous solution; smooth on skin

✅ Very high activity against bacteria, fungi, yeasts, viruses [1, 3]

✅ Application on surfaces, water, hands, food [4]

✅ Leaves no smell or taste in water

Alcohol

❌ Flammable liquids (hazardous compounds)

❌ Not useful for drinking water

❌ Low activity against certain viruses (e.g. Poliovirus, Hepatitis A virus, Human enterovirus 71, Parvovirus) [8]

❌ Slow to very slow against certain bacteria spores (e.g.Bacillus) [9]

❌ Not applicable to all surfaces (e.g. rubber)

❌ Not useful for water or food disinfection

Chlorine

❌ Leaves carcinogenic, by-products in water (trihalomethanes) [5]

❌ Can chlorinate surfaces (e.g. food)/so called 'chlorine chicken'

❌ Decreased effect at higher pH-values (above pH = 3) [6]

❌ Fails against Cryptosporidium sp. (disease causing protozoon) [7]

❌ Dangerous to apply as gas (pressure cylinder)

❌ Leaves strong chlorine smell/taste

Clover Extract (Trifolium sp.)

❌ Can be poisonous (red clover poisoning in horses)

❌ Only useful as antibiotic (medical regulation) not as disinfectant

❌ Very high concentrations necessary [15]

❌ Expensive

❌ Not in BPR review program as biocidal active substance

❌ Not active against Shigella and Pseudomonas species (harmful bacteria) [15]

Colloidal silver

❌ Toxic heavy metal

❌ Toxic ingredients within the formulation (e.g. surfactants)

❌ Environmental concern due to nanoparticles

❌ Expensive

❌ Can cause 'argyria' – permanent blue stain of skin [21]

❌ Not useful for water or food disinfection

Hydrogen peroxide

❌ Dangerous compound (transport regulation) [12]
❌ Bacteria have specific defense mechanism (enzyme: catalase) [11]

❌ High concentrations necessary (corrosive) [10]

❌ Low effect against C. albicans (infective yeast species) [13]

❌ Not useful for metal surfaces (stains)

❌ Incompatible with some surfaces (e.g. plastics, copper) [14]

Ozone

❌ Highly toxic, fatal if inhaled [16]

❌ Energy consumption [17]

❌ Difficult to apply (instrumentation) [17]

❌ Not compatible with certain materials (e.g. plastics)

❌ Not applicable for human use (e.g. hands)

❌ Low water solubility (1 ppm at 0˚C) [18]

Quats

❌ Chronic environmental toxicity with long lasting effects [19]

❌ Suspected to have reproductive toxicity [20]

❌ Cannot be applied to drink water

❌ Expensive

❌ Environmental concern over synthesis by-products

❌ Not useful for water or food disinfection

Other

Do you want us to compare to some other product? Please e-mail info@xinix.se

Sources/Citations

1. J.-W. Ma, B.-S. Huang, C.-W. Hsu, C.-W. Peng, M.-L. Cheng, J.-Y. Kao, T.-D. Way, H.-C. Yin 1, S.-S. Wang, Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a Chlorine Dioxide Solution, Int. J. Environ. Resp. Public Health, 2017, 14, 329.

2.J.R. Lubbers, S. Chauan, JR Bianchine, Controlled clinical evaluations of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate in man, Environ. Health Perspect., 1982, 46, 57–62.

3.S. Yee, YC Lim, CF Goh, Vijay Kotra, LC Ming, Efficacy of chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant, Prog. Microbes Mol. Biol., 2020; 3(1): a0000128.

4.SK Malka, M.-H. Park, Fresh Produce Safety and Quality: Chlorine Dioxide's Role, Front. Plant Sci., Sec. Crop and Product Physiology, 2022.

5.www.cdc.gov/healthywater/global/household-water-treatment/chlorination-byproducts.html

6.pKs (HClO) = 7.53; www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochlorous_acid

7.F.E. Adeyemo, G. Singh, P. Reddy, F. Bux, TA Stenström, Efficiency of chlorine and UV in the inactivation of Cryptosporidium duck Giardia in wastewater, PLoS One, 2019;14(5):e0216040.

8.G. Kampf, Efficacy of ethanol against viruses in hand disinfection, J. Hosp. Infect., 2018, 98, 331-338.

9.P. Thomas, Long-term survival of Bacillus spores in alcohol and identification of 90% ethanol as relatively more spori/bactericidal, Curr. Microbiol., 2012, 64, 130-9.

10.L.E. Murdoch, L. Bailey, E. Banham, F. Watson, N.M.T. Adams, J. Chewins, Evaluating different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in an automated room disinfection system, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2016, 63, 178—182.

11.M. Baureder, R. Reimann, L. Hederstedt, Contribution of catalase to hydrogen peroxide resistance in Enterococcus faecalis, FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2012, 331, 160–164.

12.www.echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database/-/discli/details/53297

13.BM Peters, R.M. Ward, H. S. Rane, S. A. Lee, MC Noverr, Efficacy of Ethanol against Candida albicans duck Staphylococcus aureus Polymicrobial Biofilms, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2013, 57, 74–82.

14.www.ozoneservices.com/articles/004.htm

15. A.V. Khan, Q.U. Ahmed, I. Shukla, AA Khan, Antibacterial activity of leaves extracts of Clover alexandrinum Linen. against pathogenic bacteria causing tropical diseases, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 2012, 2, 189–194.

16.www.echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database/-/discli/details/132693

17.www.molekule.com/blog/ozonegenerators/#:~:text=than%20100%20ppb.-,What%20are%20ozone%20generators%3F,these%20claims%20are%20generally%20false)

18.www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone

19.www.echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database/-/discli/details/99975

20.TC Hrubec, VE Melin, CS Shea, EE Ferguson, C. Garofola, CM Repine, TW Chapman, HR Patel, RM Razvi, JE Sugrue, H. Potineni, G. Magnin-Bissel, PA Hunt, Ambient and Dosed Exposure to Quaternary Ammonium Disinfectants Causes Neural Tube Defects in Rodents, Birth Defects Research, 109, 2017, 1166–1178.

21. JJ Kim, L. McCulley, K. Konkel, I.-L. Diak, Cases of Argyria Associated With Colloidal Silver Use, Annals of Pharmacology, 2019, 53, 867-870.

×

Net Orders Checkout

Item Price Qty Total
Subtotal 0 kr
Shipping
Total

Shipping Address

Shipping Methods